|
comex on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:28:00 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
- From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:27:56 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Q2Nm8foZpKeGTDznPFvXv864EMB3hgLKzAaph0UTSrI=; b=bpl4YVfimMPv/qDYxV3MsILGfIo/uD5/5wYV9tRGDHI6CtrnQmn4dJPuCfVJgpQO09 ZDaDURzh/Ee+wNkQF0h6Da7S+d7YdaVorbYSrUN/K7Jm+uZaXjoTz5XBDB2ZNFFefvUK d9DDuba5EFszJqMo7j9SmSBngiP8K61TgR2a8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fQkdn2sarTowrdIZ/iesDYjbID+DoH2TsDdBB48n1RuRt4z2y6P1QwR8CkFKBkfLMQ Z6yj/5ybmBCaUs4J4xSiSR3eI9iL4uKff2y0gBThioTi2fzAy3hZJ3eT9g+bhekAuRoe nc8Gz/4fM6EREuyMwuA66AfF7MBJ4ZErNLK58=
- In-reply-to: <1229077088.11003.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <6bf32280812111558q2d8ec584i31eaafe6be1e8e19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229077088.11003.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I won't object yet, just in case, but this is very ugly (that shouldn't
> be in rule 5e2!)
I'm just putting the clause back as it was. I agree with you that it
shouldn't be in Rule 5Ee2, but if you want to refactor the language
into a new rule, why not submit a standard proposal? In the meantime,
no Rule (as far as I can see) says that it's possible as a Game Action
to transfer stuff, so...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss