Alexander Smith on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:40:15 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents


ehird wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2008, at 10:18, Alex Smith wrote:
> > They're still rules-defined attributes of objects, pretty obviously  
> > from
> > the rules.
> Haha! Except for the part where your RP REMOVED THEM.
>From 5e2, yes. They're still mentioned in 5e28, not explicitly, but
clearly enough to indicate that they're some sort of property, if not
obviously a switch. Or does repealing text from one rule now suddenly
repeal it from all other rules too?

-- 
ais523

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss