Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, yeah. I remember why I didn't bring it up. Because a bad Archivist could
get paid for doing nothing. (What would his concrete responsibilities be?
It's kinda like the ol' Minister of Internomic Relations.) But now we have a
voting system so it might be ok as long as we have someone motivated to do a
bit of actual work. If that isn't enough, we could have the guy lose his pay
if enough people don't approve his progress. But that's a bit of a radical
idea, don't you think? [?]

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Minister of History?!? I was thinking the same thing at one point, but I
> never brought the subject up. I think I might like to take that Ministry
> myself. Hopefully I'll find the time to make some meaningful contributions
> to the Official B History Book. I actually kind of like going through old
> archived messages. I could even conduct interviews of some of the, shall we
> say, persistent Players.
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Charles Schaefer
>> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I'd vote for a Minister of History (aka Archivist).
>>
>> AKA... hm. Howard Zinn? Herodotus? Thucydides?
>>
>> I'd vote for it.
>>  _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  -Tyler
>



-- 
 -Tyler

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss