Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies

[Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3 Dec 2008, at 21:21, Craig Daniel wrote:

> Two emergencies in an nweek seems a little silly for a time to
> subdivide eras. The crises that prompted the transition to era 5 are
> bigger, but still seem small compared to the five-month lulls that
> ended A Nomic and the Second Era or the crash that prompted the Second
> Era to begin. But retroactively declaring that all those 4E rule
> numbers referred to the Third Era as Wooble protoproposed seems silly.

I dislike the ATS- prefix.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss