Tyler on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:00:37 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Contract Ideals Discussion |
That's a very good point, BP. Minorities need protection too. I hope that if a majority ever decides to harm a specific minority by, for example, changing their contract, there will be a very good reason to do so. (Like to destroy a scam Contract.) On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Billy Pilgrim wrote: > > > > > That said, unless we get back to Contracts that hold assets (or even > then > > if > > > they can easily transfer them to Players), > > > > Why is that relevant? Does this pertain to clauses like "the members > > are the persons who own one or more X"? > > > > I meant this in the context of, say, 9 players deciding to pass a proposal > that would change the text of a contract that binds 3 other players (to > force them into all sorts of unpleasant things). Not that that ever really > happens, just like I've never seen a proposal saying something like "teucer > may never have points" pass. Just bad sportsmanship. > > But in the above scenario, if it's merely a contract that obliges the 3 > players to do certain things, they can easily drop out, dissolve the > contract, and start it anew in the next nweek. If the Contract is something > like Articles of Incorporation, and thus can hold assets or define an > entity > that holds assets, the parties cannot simply drop out and re-form, because > then they lose the assets held by the contract entity. The contract might > be > able to transfer assets to the players, thus allowing this strategy, but I > remember a while back Socks were stuck inside non-sock corps once bought. > Corps did not have the right to give socks. > > Anyway, that's all very hypothetical, and I doubt anything of that nature > would really happen. > > BP > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss