Re: [s-d] Contract Ideals Discussion

[Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx>]

> I hate to say this, because it will make me sound like a jerk (that isn't my
> intention), but I'm going to say it anyway:
> If people are joining contracts with sketchy wording, then that's their
> problem. We're all nomic players here, let's make sure we understand things
> clearly before jumping in. (This would also prevent a lot of ruleset-related
> problems). If someone gets in over their head, let's let them call the US
> Congress and ask for a bailout.

I would support something where contracts can be designated "safe" or
"not-safe", at the contract maker's discretion. Contracts designated
"safe" would have protections for parties to the contract that
"not-safe" would not have..
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss