Re: [s-d] ranked pairs

Charles Schaefer on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:09:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] ranked pairs

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:09:02 -0800
In-reply-to: <285c99840811262012o7d07a867tafd4509d27006de9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650811261901g2a7f93b8i87bf7fe67141c615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840811262000r3ff9a4c0g3a4b81e82aab5d03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811262003g38033a85p21d276012effd061@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840811262012o7d07a867tafd4509d27006de9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/11/26, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  spamspamspam
> This might be spam. Good luck trying to prosecute me without an MoJ.
>

New theory: Back before the Epimenedes scam, we were all bound to a game of
meta-paprika without our knowlege and every action taken since then hasn't
counted because we were asleep (including paranoia changes).

Our Presidential / Canadian Federal election results weren't counted either.

I think I am awake now. I move UP.

-- 
Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Realignment?
Next by Date: [s-d] About ranked pairs...
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
Next by thread: [s-d] Realignment?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread