| Craig Daniel on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:57:01 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not that I think you can actually act on behalf of someone because a
> contract says you can, but..
>
>> So I agree to this new contract:
>> > {
>> > 1. The name of this contract is FREE MACKS 2.
>> > 2. Any person can once act on behalf of me to give 20 macks to em.
>>
>
> Who is this "me" that the contract refers to? Itself? Aside from the fact
> that we know comex to have authored the Contract, there's actually no
> indication in there who this refers to.
Agreed. FREE MACKS 2 is a near-Epimenidean pile of Consultable questions.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss