Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh

0x44 on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:34:24 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:31:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <6bf32280810221349o50d5158ck1b2b06eb879c6a42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280810221349o50d5158ck1b2b06eb879c6a42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

comex wrote:
> Aside from having more typoed words than non- (contracts now 'may
> Things'), it killed my contract.
>   
I see two typographical errors in the 1009 words of my revised refresh 
proposal.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Corporations May Things?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Corporations May Things?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread