ais523 on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:57 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic |
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:58 -0700, Charles Schaefer wrote: > 2008/10/15, ais523 <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > I'd like to point out that when a scam similar to yours was tried in > > Agora, it lead to a huge number of deregistrations and arguments. I > > think an emergency is probably needed; what if, for instance, someone > > did something SCAM-like that controlled votes on the resulting > > proposals? > > > There is a consultation pending which will invalidate my whole SCAM > (contract and corp). > > No one actually thinks I have seriously bound anyone to anything. Even I > know that SCAM is nonsense. I just wanted to see if I could pull a fast one > on you guys. If Agorans actually got into an argument over something like > SCAM, that's just another reason why B Nomic is better. :-) Well, no, I don't either. I do think the gamestate is ambiguous, though, and an Emergency is pretty much the ultimate authority to clear it up. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss