ais523 on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:57 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic


On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:58 -0700, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> 2008/10/15, ais523 <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I'd like to point out that when a scam similar to yours was tried in
> > Agora, it lead to a huge number of deregistrations and arguments. I
> > think an emergency is probably needed; what if, for instance, someone
> > did something SCAM-like that controlled votes on the resulting
> > proposals?
> 
> 
> There is a consultation pending which will invalidate my whole SCAM
> (contract and corp).
> 
> No one actually thinks I have seriously bound anyone to anything. Even I
> know that SCAM is nonsense. I just wanted to see if I could pull a fast one
> on you guys. If Agorans actually got into an argument over something like
> SCAM, that's just another reason why B Nomic is better. :-)
Well, no, I don't either. I do think the gamestate is ambiguous, though,
and an Emergency is pretty much the ultimate authority to clear it up.
-- 
ais523
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss