Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/10/15, ais523 <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:49 -0700, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> > Why does everyone in B Nomic panic so easily?
> >
> > All this contract mess could have been fixed through proposals and
> > consultations (indeed, we've already started those processes). We even
> fixed
> > C Nomic without an emergency. (Well, the one to a-b doesn't really count)
> I
> > thought emergencies were for the times where we really get stuck (i.e.
> the
> > seven month long ndelay). Let's let people (like teucer) get a few scams
> off
> > before we close up the loopholes.
> >
> > I submit the following Refresh Proposal:
> > {{Make comex a player, if he was not one already.}}
>
> I'd like to point out that when a scam similar to yours was tried in
> Agora, it lead to a huge number of deregistrations and arguments. I
> think an emergency is probably needed; what if, for instance, someone
> did something SCAM-like that controlled votes on the resulting
> proposals?


There is a consultation pending which will invalidate my whole SCAM
(contract and corp).

No one actually thinks I have seriously bound anyone to anything. Even I
know that SCAM is nonsense. I just wanted to see if I could pull a fast one
on you guys. If Agorans actually got into an argument over something like
SCAM, that's just another reason why B Nomic is better. :-)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss