Re: [s-d] [s-b] Must a contract be meaningful to be valid?

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jay Campbell wrote:
> Craig Daniel wrote:
>   
>> As a follow-up to explorations with Epimenides, I submit the following
>> contract, entitled "lhret rhlhr":
>>
>> {lhret rhlhr wjehl lryaj klher awjhye lewlj kralk jsaer yhkjl rebgl
>> aeryl ghkao iusdo ixzjd ewlho izgei ogqoi ugewo iagok dsabj vbiua
>> euiog uaoig jeaug utoai gxugi bxjah gegoy uioqi wqpre}
>>
>>     
>
> If it's a straightforward cryptogram with spacing intact (e.g. they 
> really are all five letter words) a partial solution:
>
> VELGX LEVEL IYGEV VLPTY DVEGL TIYEPG VGIVY DLTVD YOTGL PEDYV LGHAV
> TGLPV AEDTN SUOMN SQCYM GIVEN SCAGS NAZNS UAGIN STAND MOTHY BHSUT
> GUSNA UTNSA YGTUA UXNTS AQUAS HQYTE AGANP USNZS IZWLG
>   


Reversed, a few other words solve:

ROUND FNHFW THERE BLACK FEWCE FLHVW EWLRA EFHLW EHFWR LWFKZ AKLPY SHELF 
HDREW FHNEH FREGF HBIDR YAGCF HYPWF HLSBE ITORL IEKRO IASBT ORLPA SILOS 
AIDRI RTBADL ORBIS ALTOI IBRAD OBIBO VROBI

The valid words from both solutions: level given stand mothy aquas, 
round there black shelf silos.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss