Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione d

Geoffrey Spear on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:27:12 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:27:05 -0400
In-reply-to: <fa0147d90810121029x23338d03jcb3ff13fa5ef7e0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F1F8DD.3060003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fa0147d90810121029x23338d03jcb3ff13fa5ef7e0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Taral <taralx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I take whatever actions are necessary to win the game.

I suggest the Chairman interpret this as proposing a new rule to
reestablish at least one victory condition.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
  - From: Taral

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Must a contract be meaningful to be valid?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread