Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract

ehird on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:22:57 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
From: ehird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:22:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0810091220x1fffb586sbac1057431c32127@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840810081635p4e00f5e8ib551a80b340ee968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240810081639o3bbd6503sf1bed297bb3c19b6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091015t1137a8d6v84311acd79cd34c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240810091153s31c39e61n7222d1bd8fdeb45d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091220x1fffb586sbac1057431c32127@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 9 Oct 2008, at 20:20, Tyler wrote:

> You know, I was almost hoping someone would take the MoQ off my  
> hands. That
> being said, "a Retainer of 1" doesn't have meaning anymore, so  
> you're going
> to have to try again, Wooble. And I would say it's  
> counterproductive to
> assign meaningless Consultations to Priests just because someone  
> felt like
> submitting them.

I don't think you understand consultations...

-- 
ehird

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Failsafe
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread