Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Strike this whole message. Looking back, we went through all this over
>> the Switch itself, which is why in the end it specified changing "the
>> third word of this document" rather than creating a (meta-)Object. You'd
>> think I'd have learnt something.
>>     
>
>
> OK that just confused me. I thought you had a point there with your bit
> about the switch, no?
>   

I did have a point, but history didn't back me up. The switch in the 
form of a meta-object WAS objected to.

There's another example in Blue Corp:

"Any Voting Sockholder may attempt to amend this contract by posting a 
Motion by announcement. The Motion is a Game Document and should specify 
a list of Contract Actions."

As Potential Sockholders, Corporations may become Voting Stockholders, 
so this bit of text ASSUMES that a corporation is allowed to create a 
specific sub-type of Game Document called a Motion.

Either corps are allowed to create objects somewhat willy nilly, or 
incorporated Blue sockholders can't post Motions.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss