Jay Campbell on Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:26:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language |
Contracts are creating Game Objects already. Witness Black Corp: "Any Voting Sockholder may attempt to amend this contract by posting a Motion by announcement. The Motion is a Game Document and should specify a list of Contract Actions." 4E70 explicitly permits (even requires) Corporations to create Game Objects: "A Legal Entity, as a Game Action, may create a Game Document known as a Contract." There is no provision to limit Legal Entities to creating just this sub-class of Game Object, nor is there any provision in the rules to make Points a different flavor of object from other Game Objects that would make them somehow unmintable. Points are created other places than 4E19, for instance tidiness list payment. I have a proposal pending that disallows the creation of points outside explicit rules. If my transaction is challenged on the public forum, I challenge the legality and existence of several corporations. j 0x44 wrote: > Jay Campbell wrote: > >> BEGIN TRANSACTION >> >> I create the following corporation contract titled "Bailout": >> >> {{ This contract serves as the articles of incorporation for the >> corporation "Bailout", which has one officer, J, who may leave this >> contract at any time. If J posts the phrase "I receive a bajillion >> points", this contract creates a bajillion points and transfers them to >> J. }} >> >> > That fails because Game Objects can only be created in a manner > explicitly governed by the Rules. Neither 4e70 or 4e79 permit Contracts > from creating Game Objects, and points are only explicitly created in 4e19. > > Nice try, though. > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss