| Jay Campbell on Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:26:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language |
Contracts are creating Game Objects already. Witness Black Corp: "Any
Voting Sockholder may attempt to amend this contract by posting a Motion
by announcement. The Motion is a Game Document and should specify a list
of Contract Actions."
4E70 explicitly permits (even requires) Corporations to create Game
Objects: "A Legal Entity, as a Game Action, may create a Game Document
known as a Contract." There is no provision to limit Legal Entities to
creating just this sub-class of Game Object, nor is there any provision
in the rules to make Points a different flavor of object from other Game
Objects that would make them somehow unmintable. Points are created
other places than 4E19, for instance tidiness list payment. I have a
proposal pending that disallows the creation of points outside explicit
rules.
If my transaction is challenged on the public forum, I challenge the
legality and existence of several corporations.
j
0x44 wrote:
> Jay Campbell wrote:
>
>> BEGIN TRANSACTION
>>
>> I create the following corporation contract titled "Bailout":
>>
>> {{ This contract serves as the articles of incorporation for the
>> corporation "Bailout", which has one officer, J, who may leave this
>> contract at any time. If J posts the phrase "I receive a bajillion
>> points", this contract creates a bajillion points and transfers them to
>> J. }}
>>
>>
> That fails because Game Objects can only be created in a manner
> explicitly governed by the Rules. Neither 4e70 or 4e79 permit Contracts
> from creating Game Objects, and points are only explicitly created in 4e19.
>
> Nice try, though.
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss