Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.

0x44 on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:26:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:26:47 -0600
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990802131124p1931e449gdb56afe40ddc6293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <47B30C79.8010707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802130951h205cca5aie7b9a68b5e67e168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B32F21.2000502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802131110u7581d029n3c70d2553f76ab73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B342C0.50308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990802131124p1931e449gdb56afe40ddc6293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
> I saw it in the Public Forum.  Your message must be alluding to some
> rule that would mean that although it reached the Forum it was
> disregarded.
I didn't need to allude to 4e41, Rule 4e2 handles it. 4e41 specifically 
allows one to mention the Rules in general. 4e2 does so.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: stop it
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread