Geoffrey Spear on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:24:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 105.

On Feb 13, 2008 2:19 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
> > Ah, but I wouldn't say that the Enough Already quasi-proposal actually
> > alluded to 4e41. An without a clear answer to Consultation #105, we
> > can not know for sure.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> Untrue, someone can submit another Consultation that does not include
> the offending reference. In fact, I'll do so.
> I submit the following Consultation:
> {{
>     Does there exist a proposal numbered 355 as submitted by BobTHJ?
>     Reasoning:
>        Per Rule 4e2 states that a game object may only be created in
> accordance with the rules. Rule 4e15 establishes that Proposals are game
> documents. Per 4e7, Submitting a Proposal is a Game Action. Also Per
> 4e7, Game Actions must be posted to the Public Forum. The quasi-proposal
> numbered 355 never reached the Public Forum, and therefore cannot be a
> Proposal.
>     Unbeliever: BobTHJ
> }}

I saw it in the Public Forum.  Your message must be alluding to some
rule that would mean that although it reached the Forum it was
spoon-discuss mailing list