Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 9, 2008 12:48 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Since Oracularites aren't supposed to fix things, I guess you'll
> instead have to give me points just for submitting an obvious fix.
>
> I submit a Proposal, titled "Inanimate Suffrage": "In Rule 15, change
> the phrase 'Outsider that is allowed to vote on Proposals' to 'Game
> Object that is allowed to vote on Proposals'."
> <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss>
>

I don't think this is the obvious fix. This proposal broadens the scope of
Registered Voters and gives potential voting power to all Game Objects. I
think that is too dangerous. Any fix that allows the Beast to vote (assuming
that the Beast isn't already a valid Registered Voter) should be narrower in
scope.

Of course, I don't like the Beast voting, so if he turns out to not be a
Registered Voter, I'm against any proposal that would allow him to vote.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss