Mike McGann on Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:12:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting

On Feb 9, 2008 12:48 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since Oracularites aren't supposed to fix things, I guess you'll
> instead have to give me points just for submitting an obvious fix.
> I submit a Proposal, titled "Inanimate Suffrage": "In Rule 15, change
> the phrase 'Outsider that is allowed to vote on Proposals' to 'Game
> Object that is allowed to vote on Proposals'."
> <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss>

I don't think this is the obvious fix. This proposal broadens the scope of
Registered Voters and gives potential voting power to all Game Objects. I
think that is too dangerous. Any fix that allows the Beast to vote (assuming
that the Beast isn't already a valid Registered Voter) should be narrower in

Of course, I don't like the Beast voting, so if he turns out to not be a
Registered Voter, I'm against any proposal that would allow him to vote.

- Hose
spoon-discuss mailing list