Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Ordainment

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was thinking about having two separate court systems--one for criminal cases, and one for other Consultations.  The criminal Consultations are meant to have an effect on the gamestate, but the regular Consultations are supposed to just clarify it.  Any thoughts?

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2008 1:41:14 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Ordainment

I like it too. But maybe there should be some encouragement (maybe in the
form of macks or points for answering consultations) for people to keep
themselves ordained.

2008/2/9, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I quite like the idea. That said I think it might avoid headaches if you
> made anyone who holds the MoQ automatically and irreversibly ordained for
> the duration of their oracleness, since I think the Oracle is assigned any
> consultation for which there are no more eligible priests.
>
> BP
>
> On Feb 9, 2008 10:59 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I submit the following proposal titled, "Ordainment":
> >
> > {{
> > [[
> > If you don't want to be a Priest, you shouldn't have to be a priest. If
> > you
> > don't perform your duties as a Priest, you are locked out from being a
> > Priest until the next nweek.
> > ]]
> >
> > Dependency: Proposal 363, refactoring activity
> >
> > Amend Rule 18 by adding the following text in an appropriate location:
> > {{
> > An Active Player, as a Game Action, may gain the Ordained Property. Any
> > Player, as a Game Action, may remove their Ordained Property. Any Player
> > that loses the Active Property also loses the Ordained Property.
> > }}
> > and by replacing the following text:
> > {{
> > All Active Players, except the Supplicant, the Unbeliever if the
> > Consultation names one, the Oracle and Players that have already been
> > selected as Priests for that Consultation, are eligible for selection as
> > Priests.
> > }}
> > with
> > {{
> > All Ordained Players, except the Supplicant, the Unbeliever if the
> > Consultation names one, the Oracle and Players that have already been
> > selected as Priests for that Consultation, are eligible for selection as
> > Priests.
> > }}
> > and by replacing the following text:
> > {{
> > Any Priest which has not answered a consultation he has been assigned to
> > within a Jiffy ceases to be the Priest for that Consultation.
> > }}
> > with
> > {{
> > Any Priest, who is not the Oracle and has not answered a Consultation he
> > has
> > been assigned to within a Jiffy, ceases to be the Priest for any
> > Consultations he is assigned to and loses the Ordained Property. If a
> > Player
> > loses the Ordained Property in this manner, he cannot regain the
> Ordained
> > Property until the next nweek.
> > }}
> > }}
> >
> > - Hose
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss