Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

Antonio Dolcetta on Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:49:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:49:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <6d741b990802071610k5d965492u2c8338cab4f94471@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <491660.47771.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802071455u66fadc77w9b7372d36f318b5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990802071610k5d965492u2c8338cab4f94471@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 8 Feb 2008, at 01:10, Mike McGann wrote:

> On Feb 7, 2008 5:55 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> also, BobTHJ, doesn't your claim of inconsistency contain some  
>> form of
>> allusion?
>>
>>
> No, there are many things which should not be named. You can't tell  
> which
> thing, out of the set of all things which should not be named, that  
> he was
> referring to.
>

Yet we all understood what he was alluding to...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Ridiculous Alliance
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oh crap!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread