Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7 Feb 2008, at 21:41, 0x44 wrote:

> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2008 6:53 AM, Antonio Dolcetta  
>> <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I submit the following consultation:
>>>
>>> {
>>> Is Proposal 350 Hurried ?
>>> }
> I answer Consultation #106, YES.
>
> Reasoning: There are currently 8 Players with the Active Property. A
> Quiggle is defined as 1/2 the number of Active Players minus one,  
> or .5
> * 8 - 1. This nweek, a Quiggle is 3. Three players supported Hurrying
> proposal #350. Further, proposal #350 could not have been amended to
> Revision 3 prior to being Hurried, as Hose's Game Action reached the
> public forum a full seven minutes prior to the receipt of  
> Antonio's. In
> the absence of synchronized time-keeping, and in keeping with the
> vagaries of routing over the public internet upon which this game is
> played, we cannot help but to treat Game Actions as occurring in the
> order they were /Received/. Indeed, rule 4e7 establishes that Game
> Actions occur upon reaching the appropriate forum, in the order they
> arrived. Hose's Action occurred first because Hose's action arrived  
> first.
>
> I do not believe it necessary to include an Oracularity.


I'm confused, the latest report on active players says the quiggle  
this nweek is actually 5.5
Where are you getting that 3 figure ?

http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Voting_Results/138
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss