Mike McGann on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:10:19 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

On Feb 7, 2008 5:55 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> also, BobTHJ, doesn't your claim of inconsistency contain some form of
> allusion?
No, there are many things which should not be named. You can't tell which
thing, out of the set of all things which should not be named, that he was
referring to.

- Hose
spoon-discuss mailing list