Mike McGann on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:18:23 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections

On Feb 6, 2008 11:07 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How about just removing the no-objection requirement for moving a rule
> that has never been in a section into a section?
Before the persistent rule numbers, sections were important to the game
itself. There could be a rule 2-2 and a rule 3-2. Now that we have the
persistent numbers, I don't think they need to be in the rules. It places
constraints on the view of the Public Display and no other rules actually do

- Hose
spoon-discuss mailing list