Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 6, 2008 11:07 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> How about just removing the no-objection requirement for moving a rule
> that has never been in a section into a section?
>
>
Before the persistent rule numbers, sections were important to the game
itself. There could be a rule 2-2 and a rule 3-2. Now that we have the
persistent numbers, I don't think they need to be in the rules. It places
constraints on the view of the Public Display and no other rules actually do
that.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss