Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds

Mike McGann on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:29:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:29:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990802070425v688ce029o5f768702504f9f21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <509958E5-3E19-483D-B5F0-F7926EFFA81D@xxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990802070425v688ce029o5f768702504f9f21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I don't think the current Justice system is working and needs more changes
than this. I actually prefer the old way. Now, Answers are irrelevant and it
has simply become a different mechanic to enact rule changes and it isn't
even effective at doing that.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
  - From: Roger Hicks

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread