Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections

Ed Murphy on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:10:45 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:07:55 -0800
In-reply-to: <6d741b990802061945j4f42fb81t177bab9e0c59ffc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990802061945j4f42fb81t177bab9e0c59ffc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Hose wrote:

> The problem now is that when new rules are
> enacted, the no-objection requirement delays adding rules to sections.

How about just removing the no-objection requirement for moving a rule
that has never been in a section into a section?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B-Chess v1.3
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B-Chess v1.3
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Meta-Sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread