Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings

Mike McGann on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:05:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:05:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <47A8E9A0.9010501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <937906.93524.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47A8CE74.1090601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051305q7f86803due4ac07930986d003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802051357u7207a4bif029e779fcd3aa15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990802051455o24e5c30fiba2c7666be8b758b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47A8E9A0.9010501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 5, 2008 5:56 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The latest revision is the revision that was hurried. It has not been
> revised subsequent to BP's hurrying the proposal.

Yes, but what I'm saying is that it should no longer be modified. If I
have some comments of where I think something should be changed, it
isn't fair to change it now that people have given support for it.
They might not support the change.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread