Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:48:49 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 96, answered


why do you need to define quorum if you are replacing it by quiggle?

BP

On Jan 23, 2008 5:02 AM, Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Consultation #96
> > Is it possible to Hurry a Proposal?
> > Reasoning: Hurrying a Proposal requires Quorum minus one Supporters, but
> Quorum (and thus Quorum minus one) is undefined.
>
> I deeply ponder the rules and answer YES.
>
> Reasoning: I agree with the supplicant's reasoning, However since it is
> obviously an unintended mistake, and since we know that Quorum is a synonym
> for Quiggle (or the other way round) I think I may call this an ambiguity in
> the rules and try to fix it expeditiously via oracularity.
>
> So here:
>
> {
> In rule 4E30 add to the list of items: "Quorum = See Quiggle"
> In rule 4E15 replace the word "Quorum" with "a Quiggle".
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss