Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:48:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 96, answered |
why do you need to define quorum if you are replacing it by quiggle? BP On Jan 23, 2008 5:02 AM, Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Consultation #96 > > Is it possible to Hurry a Proposal? > > Reasoning: Hurrying a Proposal requires Quorum minus one Supporters, but > Quorum (and thus Quorum minus one) is undefined. > > I deeply ponder the rules and answer YES. > > Reasoning: I agree with the supplicant's reasoning, However since it is > obviously an unintended mistake, and since we know that Quorum is a synonym > for Quiggle (or the other way round) I think I may call this an ambiguity in > the rules and try to fix it expeditiously via oracularity. > > So here: > > { > In rule 4E30 add to the list of items: "Quorum = See Quiggle" > In rule 4E15 replace the word "Quorum" with "a Quiggle". > } > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss