Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 96, answered

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

I thought that adding a phrase was quicker and safer than double  
checking all devices, game documents, and who knows what else for  
istances of "quorum"

On 23 Jan 2008, at 19:48, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> why do you need to define quorum if you are replacing it by quiggle?
>
> BP
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 5:02 AM, Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Consultation #96
>>> Is it possible to Hurry a Proposal?
>>> Reasoning: Hurrying a Proposal requires Quorum minus one  
>>> Supporters, but
>> Quorum (and thus Quorum minus one) is undefined.
>>
>> I deeply ponder the rules and answer YES.
>>
>> Reasoning: I agree with the supplicant's reasoning, However since  
>> it is
>> obviously an unintended mistake, and since we know that Quorum is  
>> a synonym
>> for Quiggle (or the other way round) I think I may call this an  
>> ambiguity in
>> the rules and try to fix it expeditiously via oracularity.
>>
>> So here:
>>
>> {
>> In rule 4E30 add to the list of items: "Quorum = See Quiggle"
>> In rule 4E15 replace the word "Quorum" with "a Quiggle".
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss