Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ

0x44 on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:02:54 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:03:02 -0600
In-reply-to: <33dd05c30801141057y55e8f575le1da7176a6462cc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <34795.95561.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30801140957x65075668n85341645b11ba260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478BA325.8020404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30801141041i365a2402lbd363891ff839e75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478BAD89.7010706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30801141057y55e8f575le1da7176a6462cc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)

Aaron Coquet wrote:
> Can i modify my oracularity? amend, perhaps?
>   
Nothing in the rules allows the Priest to modify or amend an
Oracularity. In fact, it's probably better that we don't allow that. If
it were possible to amend an Oracularity, a malicious Priest could wait
until nearly 4ndays had passed after his Consultation had been answered,
and enough people had claimed it Consistent, and then alter his
Oracularity to something else.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
  - From: Aaron Coquet
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
  - From: Aaron Coquet

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] To the MoQ
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let Twins specify Conflicts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread