Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why don't you keep this proposal (well I guess resubmit) and make it
conflict with the attributes thingie proposal and then write another
proposal that is dependent on the attributes proposal and takes it into
account? or else just one proposal that says IF atributes passses, make this
change, if it doesn't, make this other change?

BP

On Jan 14, 2008 1:56 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I retract the proposal with the following text:
> Create a non-unique Blueprint named "Advanced Alchemy Lab"
> {{
> Device Name: Harsh Rejuvenation Potion
> Cost: m75
> Power: Drink
>  * Trigger: Activated by Owner
>  * Condition: Owner has not been the target of the Spray power of the
> Potion-Filled Super-Soaker in the current or previous nDay. Owner has not
> used the Drink power of a Harsh Rejuvenation Potion in the current nWeek.
>  * Effect: Owner loses 3 hit points. Over the next 3 nDays, at the end of
> each nDay, starting with the current one, the Owner of this device gains 5
> hit points (one the same nDay the Drink power is activated, two the next
> nDay, and two the nDay after that) in addition to but independent of
> normal
> hit point regeneration. One (1) of the Owner's Harsh Rejuvenation Potions
> is
> destroyed.
> }}
>
> I am doing this so I can guarentee that the attributes / thingie proposal
> soesn't wind up getting everything messed uo with mine.
>
>
> --
> Aaron C
> "H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
> Don't Panic!
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss