Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally

ihope on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:15:40 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:15:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0801111709o3813e47asfd5503d5616533b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990801111644x7b1b8dat86c178934d5dfc59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0801111709o3813e47asfd5503d5616533b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/01/2008, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alternate wording for the last sentence:
>
> "Any player which is not Alive may is immune to the effects of a
> device with the RPG Property unless an effect specifically specifies
> that it effects a Dead player."

Why not just say that a Device can override these definitions generally?

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Think Locally, Act Globally
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread