| Justin Ahmann on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:29:24 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale! |
Why ain't I stabbed nobody? I bought a Rapier from nobody (who received it after pikhq ceased to be a DOO), and have since used it to Stab comex and 0x44. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:23:07 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale! On Jan 10, 2008 6:03 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe the Consultation system should probably be fixed so that an > Answer to a question about an actual ambiguity in the gamestate > implicitly creates an Oracularity setting the gamestate to what it > would be if the Answer were true. The oracularity tweaks work great > for when the Rules are ambiguous and need to be changed to become > unambiguous, but for assertions about the current state of the game > they shouldn't be necessary. Yes. Propose that and I'll vote for it. Also I checked, and Codae ain't stabbed nobody. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss