Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:06:05 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

On Jan 1, 2008 2:30 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 2:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I also claim Murphy's answer is Inconsistent.
> Judging from your earlier post in this thread, you have different reasons
> for this claim, right??

Well, I do agree that if we interpret the rule as written to have an
unlimited maximum, then at least the first person to take advantage of
that interpretation should be allowed to benefit from it.

I disagree with the interpretation itself, too, but I'd have been
willing to give the Priest the call when the rules as written are
truly ambiguous; I can't say that his reading of "maximum" is any more
consistent or inconsistent with game custom than mine since it's never
come up before.

Geoffrey Spear
spoon-discuss mailing list