Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:30:47 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:30:44 -0500
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990801011128i3c927148wfbdba26e07066967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <391754.66485.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801010106l434ba522x43f02ac161ff3156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801011054k4fead234t17c788d2c201ea9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200801011156.54726.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990801011128i3c927148wfbdba26e07066967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 1, 2008 2:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I also claim Murphy's answer is Inconsistent.


Judging from your earlier post in this thread, you have different reasons
for this claim, right??

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Player sub-pages updated
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread