Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Although, seeing as I am the supplicant, it doesn't do anything...

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2008 4:47:51 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

I claim this INCONSISTENT.  I defer to Billy Pilgrim's reasoning.

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2008 3:48:51 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is Consultation 80.  I assign it to Priest Murphy.
>
> The most natural reading of "maximum number of hit points" is "maximum
> number of hit points that the rules permit that player to have".  There
> is no such limit, so I answer Yes.
>
> Oracularity:
>
> Amend Rule 24 (RPG) by replacing "and a default value of 10" with "a
> default value of 10, and a default maximum of 10".
>
> Each player with more than 10 Hit Points has their Hit Points set to 10.
>

I claim this to be Consistent with established doctrine.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss