| 0x44 on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:13:16 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes. |
Josiah Worcester wrote: > On Monday 31 December 2007 11:03:09 Jamie Dallaire wrote: > >> On 12/31/07, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:That will remove the >> rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if you do, damned if you >> don't. ;) >> >> Citizens, do not be FOOLED by this silver-tongued scoundrel. >> >> Claims of Inconsistency will NOT remove the Rule named "Rules"! >> >> Claims concern not only the Answer, but also the Oracularity. Furthermore, >> as per Rule 18, the Consultation will simply be reassigned to someone less >> Sneaky upon its Answer being overturned. >> >> Billy Pilgrim, Consumer Advocate >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> >> > > Fine. I claim my own answer as inconsistent. No you don't, neither the Priest, nor the Supplicant may make claims against Consultations. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss