0x44 on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:13:16 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.


Josiah Worcester wrote:
> On Monday 31 December 2007 11:03:09 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>   
>> On 12/31/07, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:That will remove the
>> rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if you do, damned if you
>> don't. ;)
>>
>>  Citizens, do not be FOOLED by this silver-tongued scoundrel.
>>
>> Claims of Inconsistency will NOT remove the Rule named "Rules"!
>>
>> Claims concern not only the Answer, but also the Oracularity. Furthermore,
>> as per Rule 18, the Consultation will simply be reassigned to someone less
>> Sneaky upon its Answer being overturned.
>>
>> Billy Pilgrim, Consumer Advocate
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>>     
>
> Fine. I claim my own answer as inconsistent.
No you don't, neither the Priest, nor the Supplicant may make claims
against Consultations.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss