Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 31 December 2007 11:02:15 Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2007 12:58 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 31 December 2007 10:55:31 Mike McGann wrote:
> > > I claim this as Inconsistent to prevent the Oracularity.
> > >
> > > - Hose
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-business mailing list
> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >
> >
> > That will remove the rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if 
you
> > do, damned if you don't. ;)
> >
> > H. Minister of Questions, could you submit a consultation concerning 
whether
> > or not I am the dictator? :p
> 
> No it won't.  If a Consultation is found to be Inconsistent, it's
> assigned to another Priest and the existing Answer and Oracularity are
> thrown out.
> 
> I claim this answer was INCONSISTENT.

Curses. Brilliant scam, foiled by the rules!

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss