Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.

Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:03:13 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:03:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <200712311058.30028.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200712311049.44989.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990712310955m64377a5cwfe823162a82fd908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200712311058.30028.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>

On 12/31/07, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:That will remove the
rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if you do, damned if you
don't. ;)

 Citizens, do not be FOOLED by this silver-tongued scoundrel.

Claims of Inconsistency will NOT remove the Rule named "Rules"!

Claims concern not only the Answer, but also the Oracularity. Furthermore,
as per Rule 18, the Consultation will simply be reassigned to someone less
Sneaky upon its Answer being overturned.

Billy Pilgrim, Consumer Advocate
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
  - From: Josiah Worcester

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread