Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:28:45 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Nomicbot Wins


On Dec 28, 2007 5:18 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 14:58:36 Mike McGann wrote:
> > I submit the following Proposal titled "Nomicbot Wins":
> >
> > [[Hmmm, it seems the era is hard coded into Nomicbot, so.....]]
> >
> > {{
> > Amend Rule 1-12 by replacing the text:
> > {{
> > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx.
> > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and ending
> > immediately before the start of The Fourth Era of B Nomic.
> > }}
> > with
> > {{
> > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx.
> > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and continuing to
> > the present.
> > }}
> >
> > Amend Rule 1-12 by removing the following text:
> > {{
> > The Fourth Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 135 (10 Dec
> > 2007, prompted by a second State of Emergency in 2 nweeks), and
> > continuing to the present.
> > }}
> > }}
> >
> > - Hose
> Who cares about the failures of Nomicbot to keep up the rules? Are we playing
> Nomicbot, or B Nomic? Come on. . .

I have to agree.  I was already thinking of building a second nomicbot
to turn the Clock off at the start of ndays 1 and 9; might as well
have it change the era every day too when I get around to coding the
damn thing.



-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss