Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:28:45 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Nomicbot Wins |
On Dec 28, 2007 5:18 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 28 December 2007 14:58:36 Mike McGann wrote: > > I submit the following Proposal titled "Nomicbot Wins": > > > > [[Hmmm, it seems the era is hard coded into Nomicbot, so.....]] > > > > {{ > > Amend Rule 1-12 by replacing the text: > > {{ > > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx. > > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and ending > > immediately before the start of The Fourth Era of B Nomic. > > }} > > with > > {{ > > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx. > > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and continuing to > > the present. > > }} > > > > Amend Rule 1-12 by removing the following text: > > {{ > > The Fourth Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 135 (10 Dec > > 2007, prompted by a second State of Emergency in 2 nweeks), and > > continuing to the present. > > }} > > }} > > > > - Hose > Who cares about the failures of Nomicbot to keep up the rules? Are we playing > Nomicbot, or B Nomic? Come on. . . I have to agree. I was already thinking of building a second nomicbot to turn the Clock off at the start of ndays 1 and 9; might as well have it change the era every day too when I get around to coding the damn thing. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss