Josiah Worcester on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:18:56 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Nomicbot Wins |
On Friday 28 December 2007 14:58:36 Mike McGann wrote: > I submit the following Proposal titled "Nomicbot Wins": > > [[Hmmm, it seems the era is hard coded into Nomicbot, so.....]] > > {{ > Amend Rule 1-12 by replacing the text: > {{ > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx. > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and ending > immediately before the start of The Fourth Era of B Nomic. > }} > with > {{ > The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112 (approx. > 14 Nov 2006, prompted by another five-month lull) and continuing to > the present. > }} > > Amend Rule 1-12 by removing the following text: > {{ > The Fourth Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 135 (10 Dec > 2007, prompted by a second State of Emergency in 2 nweeks), and > continuing to the present. > }} > }} > > - Hose Who cares about the failures of Nomicbot to keep up the rules? Are we playing Nomicbot, or B Nomic? Come on. . . _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss