Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.

0x44 on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:21:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:22:36 -0600
In-reply-to: <14EF0A6C-2DA1-41D8-B65B-518DB993D9D9@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <0E112F08-554B-47BE-BCCA-5673CF7F86BB@xxxxxxxxx> <47628833.1010308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B2764C66-136C-4EE1-BC6C-5D070D0D3671@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0712140834n3cf71c91le35fe5b4591191f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14EF0A6C-2DA1-41D8-B65B-518DB993D9D9@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022)

Daniel Lepage wrote:
> *In theory* it could take only one day. In theory, a Consultation  
> could also take only one day - if all the right people are online at  
> once, a Consultation could go through in under ten minutes.
>   
It takes 4 ndays for a Consultation to become Pondered. Which means that
your theoretical minimum for determining the validity of an action is
wrong. If an Answered Consultation takes effect before it becomes
Pondered, doesn't an Answer overturned on claims break rule 3-1?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
  - From: Daniel Lepage
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My RP: Set everything.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread