William Berard on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:04:21 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] meta-proposal: a theoretical framework for ending the Emergency without waiting |
On 12/12/07, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 07:37:58 Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > Consider this: > > > > Some Player announces in the Public Forum that he is, as a Game > > Action, changing the beginning of the 1st paragraph of Rule 1-10 to > > read "Any player (as a Game Action) may, with 2 support, declare any > > Game Action which has occurred within the past NDay to be Invalid". > > > > We all agree not to declare this patently illegal game action Invalid > > within the next nday. We also all agree to adopt a Refresh Proposal > > harshly punishing anyone who does declare this action Invalid. > > > > Tomorrow night at 0:00 UTC, Rule 1-10 automatically ratifies the > > change to itself, we all turn our panic buttons off, and live happily > > ever after. > > > > --Wooble > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > > > Agora's Child submits the following transaction: > BEGIN TRANSACTION > As a Game Action, I change > { > Any player (as a Game Action) may declare any Game Action which has occurred > within the past NDay to be Invalid, unless that Game Action was to declare > another Game Action invalid, or to submit a consultation. An invalid Game > Action is treated as if it never occurred. An Outsider whose Game Action has > been declared invalid may submit a consultation whose text reads "XXX is > valid", where XXX is the Game Action they attempted to perform. When that > consultation becomes Pondered, if the priest answered it Yes, the Player who > declared that game action to be invalid loses 10 Points. > } > to read > { > Any player (as a Game Action) may, with 2 support, declare any Game Action > which has occurred within the past NDay to be Invalid, unless that Game > Action was to declare another Game Action invalid, or to submit a > consultation. An invalid Game Action is treated as if it never occurred. An > Outsider whose Game Action has been declared invalid may submit a > consultation whose text reads "XXX is valid", where XXX is the Game Action > they attempted to perform. When that consultation becomes Pondered, if the > priest answered it Yes, the Player who declared that game action to be > invalid loses 10 Points. > } > in rule 1-10. > END TRANSACTION > I stop my panic button. > The AFO, if it is a PEP, stops its panic button. > > Is Agora's Child a player? I sort of lost track. Mind you, it could very well submit this just as an external force... _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss