Re: [s-d] Not a Proposal: Dependence Day

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, still a little confused with the first one. Is this wording better?
Replace:
{{
A Game Action is dependent when it is performed without N (default 1)
objections and/or with M (default 1) supporters.
}}
with
{{
A Game Action that requires M (default 1) supporters or without N (default
1) objections is a Dependent Game Action.
}}


On Dec 10, 2007 9:53 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Not really... even if your group were the only players, you still have to
> wait 4 (although I think I might bump that back down to 2) rdays before
> you can do anything.  Plenty of time for everyone to panic.
>
> Maybe the single objection required to cancel them will make Tweaks hard
> to
> perform, but I'd rather see that in practice before making it too easy.
>
>
If my rewording was your initial intent, then yeah, you are right and I
agree with 'not really'. How about adding something to allow "more
supporters than objectors (if that is even a word)" in ndays and have that
used in the Tweaks rule. Also why rdays instead of ndays?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss