0x44 on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:22:03 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.


Daniel Lepage wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:21 PM, 0x44 wrote:
>
>   
>> Daniel Lepage wrote:
>>     
>>> On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mike McGann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On Dec 10, 2007 1:37 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I'm not defending this - we ought to rewrite r0. But that's what it
>>>>> says at the moment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I bluffed. I am not sleeping.
>>>>
>>>> I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of
>>>> nweek 134
>>>> or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)!
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Wait, aren't we in the Fourth Era already?
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Rule 1-12:
>> The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112.
>>     
>
> Huh. Where are the boundaries defined?
>
>   
Rule 1-12. There is no upper bound to the Third Era, it continues until
we decide that we need to reset the rules.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss