0x44 on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:22:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now. |
Daniel Lepage wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:21 PM, 0x44 wrote: > > >> Daniel Lepage wrote: >> >>> On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mike McGann wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 10, 2007 1:37 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm not defending this - we ought to rewrite r0. But that's what it >>>>> says at the moment. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I bluffed. I am not sleeping. >>>> >>>> I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of >>>> nweek 134 >>>> or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)! >>>> >>>> >>> Wait, aren't we in the Fourth Era already? >>> >>> >>> >> Rule 1-12: >> The Third Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 112. >> > > Huh. Where are the boundaries defined? > > Rule 1-12. There is no upper bound to the Third Era, it continues until we decide that we need to reset the rules. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss