Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retract Proposal 227

Mike McGann on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:27:22 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retract Proposal 227

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retract Proposal 227
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 13:27:13 -0500
In-reply-to: <200712091123.19166.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990712091020s2877c920tb9dff7fecee6a0a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200712091123.19166.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 9, 2007 1:23 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I retract Proposal 230. No sense in punishing people for not using Spivak. :p

Is it really called Spivak? I just grabbed that term from Wooble's
proposal. Where did it get that name? What are its origins?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retract Proposal 227
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Cut it out!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Use Sequential Rule Numbers
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Cut it out!
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retract Proposal 227
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread