Re: [s-d] [s-b] Cut it out!

["William P. Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 9 déc. 07, à 03:11, Daniel Lepage a écrit :

> I propose:
>
> {{
> __Stop that!__
>
> Create a new rule:
> {{
> __ Stop that! __
>
> Mildly spamming spoon-business or spoon-discuss is Misdemeanor with a
> minimum penalty of 5m and a maximum penalty of 20m.
>
> Severely spamming either list is a Felony with a minimum penalty of
> 30m and a maximum penalty of 100m, plus loss of all points and/or
> mackerel that would be gained by the perpetrator as a result of passed
> proposals during that nweek.
> [[ You can make the case to the Priest as to whether what you're doing
> counts as spamming, and as to how severe it is. ]]
>
> }}
> }}
>

quite an interesting proposal, but how would you define "spamming" ?


> {{
> __ Contempt __
>
> Create a new rule:
> {{
> __Contempt of Court__
>
> If a player submits 5 Consultations in the same nweek that are all
> ZOTTED, that player is Held in Contempt of Court.
>
> Being Held in Contempt of Court is a Misdemeanor.
> The minimum penalty for being Held in Contempt of Court is a fine of
> 10m.
> The maximum penalty for being Held in Contempt of Court is a fine of
> 60m, plus a limit of at most one proposal during the following nweek.
> }}
>
> -- 
> Wonko
>
> On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Justin Ahmann wrote:
>
>> I obtain 10 trouts.
>>
>> I use 10 trouts to obtain a red-violet Jester's Cap.
>>
>> I take off my yellow-orange Jester's Cap.
>>
>> I ask Antonio which Jester's Cap I should wear.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2007 8:55:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Accessorizing
>>
>> I wrote:
>>
>>> pikhq wrote:
>>>
>>>> I create the following agreement:
>>> [snip]
>>>> 7) A Jester's Cap may be put on or taken off.
>>>
>>> So much for the precedent of CFJ 1628.
>>
>> Whoops, wrong nomic.  In case you're interested, though:
>>
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1628
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1629
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1630
>>
>> (I think these were submitted for the purpose of manipulating
>> the everyone-gets-a-turn-to-judge mechanism.  I forget whether
>> said manipulation was selfish, or to work around a rule bug.)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss