Josiah Worcester on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 04:14:21 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Sane Partnerships |
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:11:29 Mike McGann wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 10:10 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm using them for attempts to scam *and* particularly amusing contortions of > > the rules that don't break the game. > > > > (currently, I'm trying to get Agora to join Agora's Child, which is itself a > > member of Agora. Mmmm, recursion.) > > I think a stack overflow would break the game. > > - Hose > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > I don't think so. We optimize tail recursion. The proposal to allow Agora to join Agora's Child would allow only the ambassador to act on Agora's behalf in Agora's Child. . . Thanks to the AFO's membership, we get an odd scenario: I am the Speaker, and two of the voters. (lambda x (x x)) (lambda x (x x)) ; w00ts? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss