Re: [s-d] [s-b] Sane Partnerships

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Can anyone tell me what the reasoning or purpose is for having
partnerships and/or factions?

- Hose

On Dec 3, 2007 9:24 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Monday 03 December 2007 19:22:25 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 2007 8:24 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > With 3 support, all Nonhuman Registered Voters may be restricted from
> > > voting
> > > on a proposal.
> >
> >
> > How about replacing all by any in this sentence? Leaves less ambiguity for
> > allowing one NRV to vote on a proposal while not allowing another. Unless
> > your intention was all or nothing..
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
> The intention *was* an all or nothing. . . Trying to do something remotely
> similar to Agora's democratic votes (in its treatment of partnerships),
> without adding a few pages of rules.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss