| Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 03:22:28 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Sane Partnerships |
On Dec 3, 2007 8:24 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > With 3 support, all Nonhuman Registered Voters may be restricted from > voting > on a proposal. How about replacing all by any in this sentence? Leaves less ambiguity for allowing one NRV to vote on a proposal while not allowing another. Unless your intention was all or nothing.. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss